Saturday, January 25, 2020

Jessie Popes Attitude toward War in the Poem Whos For the Game Essay

Jessie Pope was a journalist who wrote recruitment poems for the Daily Mail during the First World War. The poems she did write were positive propaganda poems for the war; her objective was to stimulate patriotism in the readers so that the men would join the forces. Pope wrote a persuasive poem where she compared war to a game. This is illustrated in the title 'Who's for the game?' It shows that her attitude toward war was that it was a great big event that everyone should take part in one way or another. The title is a short and punchy question inviting anyone to answer. This gives the wrong impression of the war, it is misleading. Pope was ridiculed for doing this, but if she did write the actual reality of war, no one would really want to join, therefore the aim of the poem would not be fulfilled and the British army would have no chance of wining in the war. Stanza one begins again by referring to the war as a 'game' for the above reason and also emphasises that it is the 'biggest' game ever known, war is not a game where you may loose points but where it is likely to loose a limb or loose your life. By her saying war it the game, 'the biggest that's played,' Jessie Pope gives a false notion in the first line and makes war sound remarkable when clearly it is not. The 'game' is then repeated to enforce excitement even more. Pope goes on to imply it could be a violent game, appealing to the masculine instinct whilst there is a comparison between 'the red crashing game' and the red blood shed in war, she makes it seem like a boxing match. Jessie Pope continues to base the poem on a game by stating: 'Who'll grip and tackle t... ...nza because she personalises it in other ways by commanding them to join to rescue their country, respond to its call for help and using 'you'. In conclusion it is a very simple and assertive poem that was popular with the general public as Jessie Pope's writing contained the normal indifferent public's view that supported the war from the safety of their home. The poem, 'Who's for the game?' were disliked by some for the misleading remarks but also admired by others for the basic language which was easy for all to comprehend. The attitudes expressed in the poem were that war should not be treated as a serious and avoided subject but something that should be enjoyed by courageous men willing to fight for their country without hesitation and men who were not eager to join were considered cowards and should be ashamed.

Friday, January 17, 2020

Critical Lens To Kill a Mockingbird Essay

â€Å"The bravest of individuals is the one who obeys his or her conscience† said J.K. Clarke. In other words, he his saying that a person who does what is right rather than the easier choice requires courage. This is proven in the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee shows how brave Atticus is for putting an effort into defending Tom Robinson (a black man), when it is unacceptable in his society, and obeying his conscience. In the novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, Atticus’ point of view is vital in the defense of Tom Robinson. There are many reasons why he is defending Tom Robinson, one of them is that everyone is equal. He stated this many times during the trial, that all men are equal and Tom Robinson should be given the equality. He also states that if he doesn’t defend Tom Robinson â€Å"†¦I couldn’t hold my head up in town.† In other words, he wouldn’t forgive himself, and regret it for his whole life. His point of view is to respect himself and the client whomever it is. Characterization was also used in To Kill a Mockingbird. Atticus’ personality was described throughout the novel, little by little. He is a very physiological personality. For example, he says to Scout, â€Å"You never really understand a person until you consider things from his point of view until you climb into his skin and walk around in it.† This shows how he as a moral compass, in other words, he has a sense of direction in what is right and wrong. He is also very determined in his beliefs, he is determined to get a fair trail for Tom Robinson. He needed all these qualities to have the courage to defend Tom Robinson. Atticus is very courageous to follow his conscience. He thinks that Tom Robinson should have a fighting chance. He tries his hardest in to defending Tom Robinson even though it is unacceptable in today’s society because he sticks to his beliefs and he doesn’t let society interfere with it.

Thursday, January 9, 2020

Should Scientists Create Artificial Living Things

Marquita Hall Dr. Paterson Biomedical Ethics 413 04/2017 Test Questions 1. Should Scientists Create Artificial Living Things? My personal opinion is, no. I feel as if scientist should not create artificial living things. Artificial designed machines usually wear out with use, especially if you keep them running for so long without maintenance. In humans organisms, they will typically renew their parts until death (Douglas, et.al,2013). The creation of artificial living things need to be designed to benefit others for it to be considered ethical. Depending on your belief can help define what is the meaning of life(Zemp,2012). We as humans were made by God whereas God helps us live an eternally joyful life if we establish a relationship†¦show more content†¦The choices result in two arguments that need to be backed up to be considered ethical. Mayer defines bioethics as, choices between values, beliefs, and actions with moral dilemmas or ethical problems that involve conflict, choosing between equally desirable or undesirable alternatives, or balancing options (Mayer,2001).Ethics is increased through the people of the world by making positive choices that influence the law of medicine, insurance, civil rights and justice. (Devettere,2009). If people make choices, then it would be easier to define the good and bad in the world. Once we figure out what is good and bad, the system will be able to serve justice, people will be treated fairly, and the people of the world will be able to make decisions that are not government based. 4. Who can serve as a proxy for medical decisions? Give two examples and discuss their pros and cons. A Proxy can be defined as someone who is considered an authority that makes ethical decision for someone who is unrepresented. Instead of self -government, you allow others who you trust, to make decisions for you. A proxy is also considered someone who takes into consideration the risks and benefits of a patient for their best interest. Someone who could be considered as a proxy, would be a physician. A physician in this case would be the individual that is the primary decision maker for the unrepresented. This can result in something positive because of their trusting relationshipShow MoreRelatedU.s. Senate Armed Services Committee1399 Words   |  6 Pagesmanufacturers have the capability to collaborate with scientists to create new gear for troops fighting for their country. However, rather than doing that, manufacturers and scientists alike are investing billions of federal dollars in artificial soldiers and machinery. Rather than increasing the physical protection of soldiers in battle conditions, they are frugally wasting money on the possibility of a success in the development of a wartime fighter of artificial intelligence. Meanwhile, troops overseas areRead MoreShould Cloning Be Beneficial?1076 Words   |  5 Pagesmany examples† (Cloning). Cloning has a lot of controversy surrounding it. Some people believe that it shouldn’t be used in science. There are also people out there that believe it is extraordinary and should be used on a daily basis. There are many benefits to cloning, but there are also many things most people don’t know about genetic cloning, such as how it works and that it occasionally happens naturally. I will be writing about how genetic cloning works, the risks involved, and how it can be beneficialRead MoreArtificial Intelligence And Human Science1309 Words   |  6 PagesImagine living life without the fear of cancer, or injuries, or even a headache. Imagine being immortal. Now imagine looking down at your arms and seeing metal, or knowing the warmth of that hug you just had was not body heat but just an electrochemical signal that told your brain to feel that way. Imagine this, for the rest of your immortal life. Technology is improving at an astonishing rate in the field of human science. Artificial hearts and wombs are successful in transplants, and more utilizableRead MoreReproductive and Therapeutic Cloning: Dolly The Sheep1468 Words   |  6 Pages New research techniques have made it possible to engineer and explore differences in the sets of chromosomes in organisms. This has been a technological revolution during the last decade. Allowing scientists to be able to explore DNA to a new extent. During the process of this research it has come apparent that foreign DNA inserted into self-replicating genetic elements such as bacteria plasmids can replicate. This breakthrough has also shown that the plasmids that have been used can also be usedRead MoreThe Pros and Cons of Human Cloning Essay601 Words   |  3 Pagessociety. Ban human cloning!, Jean Bethke Elshtain author of To Clone or Not to Clone, displays a strong argument as to why human cloning should be banned. Cloning may bring advances in artificial organs, cosmetics, and age reduction; but nevertheless it takes away a humans individuality, uniqueness, and basically that persons right to live his own life. Scientists have high hopes about cloning and what it might bring. They are talking about setting back the biological clocks and even giving immortalityRead MorePros Cons of the Technological Imperative1312 Words   |  6 Pagesof his new invention of flying but when asks, does not know why he invented it. â€Å"Here is the man who has made a certain machine, and yet asks us what he has created. It is only necessary that he create, without knowing what â€Å", (Bradbury, page 209). It was created but there was no reason to create it. It was a great invention but he did not know why he did it. â€Å"I have found beauty. I have flown on the morning wind†¦I can’t say how beautiful it is up in the sky†¦ That is beautiful, Emperor, thatRead MoreHuman Tissue Toxicity Experimentation Will Allow For Eradication Of Animal Testing1480 Words   |  6 PagesChimpanzees are the closest living genetic animal to humans, even closer linked than gorillas. Scientist Joe A guirre’s data conveys there’s a 1.2% difference between humans and chimpanzees DNA. Chimpanzees watch over their families and have long lasting friendships. They spend all day with their family playing, exploring the rainforest, grooming each other.According to one of PETA’s co-founders Alex Pacheco , there’s a different description of how chimpanzees spend their days in Silver SpringRead MoreWhat is Cloning?931 Words   |  4 PagesCloning today holds a position of one of the most sought after inventions to cure humanity from organ failure and diseases. Scientists are working towards the elimination of human problems in the medical field and advancing in research so that immortality will one day be attainable. This could be a significant breakthrough for the human race, however dabbling in artificial creation remains unhealthy and factitious. Just as cloning falls under the same pretence of unnatural and dangerous life, soRead MoreThe Age Of Artificia l Intelligence1418 Words   |  6 PagesJennie Nguyen Ms.Decker Honors English IV 24 Sept. 2015 The Age of Artificial Intelligence â€Å"Intelligence is described as the ability to adapt to new environments and situations and being able to understand consequences and effects that your actions cause. This is something that all living creatures have in some way or another. Animals can adapt to their environments and react to interference, and plants do the same. Human intelligence, however, is in an entirely different ball park. With the upriseRead MoreEssay on Cloning: How Far Should We Go?627 Words   |  3 Pagesmany: should human cloning be a part of our society? Recently the ability to clone a human being has become a very realistic possibility. However, the issue of morality has taken center stage on this topic. A Gallup poll taken in 1997 revealed eighty-eight percent of Americans stated, cloning human beings would be morally wrong (Dudley 10). Some people, such as scientists in this field and certain infertile couples, are arguing against banning cloning. However, human cloning should be banned